Michael D. Higgins: Galway’s Gombeen Man?

I received some fascinating information today concerning past misdeeds on the part of Michael D. Higgins, and have since heard the story is causing quite a stir online.

The gist of this drama is that in 1994, Michael D. Higgins faced questions in the Dáil over letters from his government department sent to constituents in Galway containing promotional material for a Labour candidate in the European Parliament elections. Higgins said that it only involved a tiny number of recipients, and was due to a clerical error. The reply from an opposing TD was that his own branch chairman got one, which would imply that it involved far more than a tiny number. Hence the question: did Higgins lie when he said it was just a clerical error and a tiny number?

There is also the related issue of Higgins sending out letters to his own constituency in which he seems to be trying to take some of the credit for their applications for housing grants having been accepted. This sounds like fairly typical gombeenism in Irish politics, something which Michael D. Higgins has strongly condemned in the past.

Here is the relevant link:

http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/1994/04/28/00025.asp

In 1994 Fine Gael TD Padraic McCormack raises a question about Labour literature turning up in envelopes from a government department that informed successful grant recipients:

Mr. McCormack: I raise a very serious abuse of his position by the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht. I hope I have done him a favour by highlighting this abuse and that the practice has now ceased. I was pleased to facilitate the Minister by agreeing to postpone the matter until he could be present.

This matter was brought to my attention by a number of alert constituents in the Gaeltacht area of west Galway.

Is é seo an saghas litir a bhfuil an tAire ag seoladh amach gach seachtain go mhuintir Gaeltacht Chonamara.

I will read a translation of the letter:

A Chara,

About your application for a grant under the Gaeltacht Housing Act, you will be glad to hear that a grant of £2,300 is granted in your case.

My Department will send you an official letter shortly.

Sincerely,

Michael D.

McCormack then goes on to point out how Michael D Higgins had previously criticised Fianna Fáil for this practice, and highlights how this type of clientelism had been roundly condemned by Higgins himself:

The extraordinary aspect of the letter is that the Minister sent it to people who never contacted him in the first place. It is obvious he uses inside information to write to people whom he feels might be convinced he is in some way influential in getting them a grant. It is incomprehensible that he would send out in the same prepaid envelope an accompanying slip asking the people to vote for a Labour candidate in the European elections. This states “Please Vote — No. 1 GALLAGHER, Ann”. So much for the candidature of his colleague, the Minister of State at the Department of the Gaeltacht, who is also a candidate in Connacht-Ulster for the European Parliament.

It is unbelievable that the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht should engage in this and similar tactics on joining Fianna Fáil in Government. In Opposition he strongly condemned such practices and often castigated politicans engaged in lesser types of clientelism or gombeen politics. He has surpassed Fianna Fáil in his practice of attempted deception of the electorate.

Where are the ethics in government of the Labour Party? Where is the Deputy Michael D. whom we all knew, and some loved? Where is the Michael D. who wrote the pamphlet on “Clientelism in Irish Politics”? I read a copy of his booklet and it is unbelievable that one who so abhorred and condemned such practices should now become a master of the art. He should read again his own publication. I have found many suitable quotations from his work which would condemn his present pursuit of gombeenism in Irish politics. There are many notable quotations one could use from the Minister’s own publication, if time permitted. I will make it available to any interested students of political clientelism but I will quote only two small passages. On page 121 he states:

Clientelist politicians in the opinion of the author rarely objectively influence a decision. They create the illusion of assistance however.

In the last paragraph on page 138 he says:

I am convinced that the clientelist approach seriously sells as short and distracts attention from the real basis of economic exploitation, political domination and ideological manipulation in Irish society.

This flowery language is a direct quotation from The Limits of Clientelism — towards an assessment of Irish Politics by Michael D. Higgins.

Those were the days my friend, I thought they would never end. I hope I have achieved some good in correcting the Minister in the error of his ways and perhaps nipped this serious matter in the bud.

Higgins tries to offer a robust defence:

Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht (Mr. M. Higgins): Dírim aire aird an Teachta McCormack ar an bhfeagra a thug mé sa Teach ar an ceist seo uaidh faoin ábhar chéanna ar an 26 Aibreán 1994.

As I stated then arrangements are in place in my Department whereby individuals, committees or organisations are informed of decisions in regard to grants which have been approved as a result of applications submitted by them. I have made inquiries with regard to the reference the Deputy has made to canvassing material for the European elections and I communicated this to him in the reply to his parliamentary question, which he now chooses to ignore. It appears that during Easter when I was absent from my office due to illness, a member of my staff inadvertently included in a small number of letters referring to departmental matters a canvassing card for Ann Gallagher. A small number of letters were inadvertently placed with letters addressed to members of the Labour Party and as I was absent she signed them on my behalf.

And the devastating response:

Mr. McCormack: My branch chairman got one.

Advertisements

About Cranky Notions
Reactionary. That fella from the Norris scandal.

16 Responses to Michael D. Higgins: Galway’s Gombeen Man?

  1. I’m absolutely blown away.
    Amazed you found evidence of something that happens every single week.

    WOW

  2. Michael D Higgins won’t like seeing this in the public domain. He has built his reputation on being Mister Clean Leftie who is way above all this clientelist stuff. Yes, it might be a non-issue:
    1. if it involved some backwood FFer
    2. and if said backwood FFer wasn’t now the front runner to be head of state.

  3. baconbiter says:

    Here’s what I think of the Rat-Commie-Liberal dirt-bag Higgins.

    He’s the big pus-filled green one in the middle of this guy’s shoulder blades.

    http://www.news-press.com/article/20110809/CRIME/110809031

  4. Guest says:

    Higgins is even more repellent and pompous than the Aras bandit, more evil than the evil goblins Jedward, an all. 70% of the respondents in a recent Red See Poll admitted that they found themselves overwhelmed with the sudden compulsion to plant their boot firmly in his bollocks the minute he opens his mouth? Higgins dismissed the poll as an, er, knee jerk reaction. Can’t we go back to having auld alcoholics in the Park, instead of trying to prove how liberal we are. It all started with Noddy two-pensions, who insulted the highest office in the land after she did a runner for a better gig with the worse than useless UN. Our present incumbent is not bad. Extent her term by another four years. Tell the rest to fuck off and start working for a living.

  5. thesystemwanks says:

    Small potatoes.

  6. Colin says:

    You don’t support any presidential candidate but only attack those on the left. You seriously can’t dig any dirt on Gay Mitchell?

    This is such a boring non story.

    • I thought it was interesting mainly due to Higgins’s reputation of incorruptibility. Examples of gombeenism in Ireland also happen to interest me.

      This blog does not endorse Gay Mitchell, the EU apparatchik who, like his Fine Gael colleagues, sold out his own country during the Lisbon Treaty debates.

  7. roxymuzak says:

    Higgins, a sniveling wretch, was standing on a box – off camera – during last night’s TV debate to give himself a bit of stature.

    The great Alan Ladd, also a pygmy, used demand that his leading ladies walk in trenches so they wouldn’t look taller than him.
    Ladd used stand on a box – off camera – when he was snogging the hot vixens.

    Higgins is the Alan Ladd of irish politics.

    Meantime, he’s suing the Dublin City Council – for building the ground so close to his arse, the ceiling so far from his head.

  8. roxymuzak says:

    TSW. I know Bilbo Baggins. Michael D is no Bilbo Baggins! I looked at the debate again and he was standing on something….lord save us.

    Meantime, Norris is heading out the door – no need to release those other letters…

    But what is Ireland coming too? Has it now gone to the stage where you can’t even write letters to an Israeli court appealing on behalf of your child raping former lover, have deeply disturbing views on middle aged men (peadophiles) having sex with children and draw a disability allowance while on 60 grand a year without having your suitability as a potential President questioned.

    “Is it cause I is an aras bandit” to paraphrase Ali G.

    Shame on Ireland.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: