They Must Go


It was amazing to witness the macabre media circus after Toulouse. Less than a year ago, many people irresponsibly jumped to label an attack on Norwegian leftists a jihadist atrocity, when in fact the killer was a white nationalist. In Toulouse, the situation was reversed. The left throughout the world hi-jacked the murders of innocent Jews and Muslim soldiers by blaming the killings on a Neo-Nazi in order to attack the politics of Nicholas Sarkozy. A New York Times headlined proclaimed the “Killings Could Stall Election’s Nationalist Turn” and blamed “anti-immigrant political talk” for creating a climate of hate.

Unfortunately for the left, it was a Muslim. A homegrown Salafist (now Egypt’s second largest political movement after the Muslim Brotherhood) who was actually being monitored by the intelligence services. Mohammed Merah murdered a three-year old child named Gavriel, a little boy named for one of the victims of the infamous assault by Islamists on the Chabad House in Mumbai in 2008. Merah’s relatively quick death at the hands of French police was far too kind a fate.

Jews have helped enrich all aspects of French life, from Sarah Bernhardt to the Citroen. They never got much thanks in return, from Dreyfus to Drancy, and to the murders and intimidation of the present day. There is another minority community, however, that contributes far less to France apart from welfare scroungers and violent chauvinists. For mentioning this inconvenient truth, I could be called all sorts of unpleasant things, but now is a time for truth over stupid protocol.

According to the New York Post, Merah was a petty criminal on welfare, and other sources have indicated he has received a plethora of state handouts, including housing. They not only tolerate this kind of Islamist rodent in France, the poor taxpayer has to subsidize them. Fascinatingly, the older brother of the Toulouse gunman has said he is “proud” of Mohammed Merah’s actions, and a teacher in a French school held a moment of silence and appreciation for this murderer. My solution to this is quite simple: all Islamists from or entitled to the citizenship of another country should lose their European passports and be sent promptly to whatever dump they belong in, at their own expense if possible. Mass immigration from Third World, Islamic countries is going to have to be severely curtailed. This is how you drain the subversive Islamist swamp, not by blaming Israel or justified public skepticism of mass immigration.


About Cranky Notions
Reactionary. That fella from the Norris scandal.

7 Responses to They Must Go

  1. Why should lazy Jews receive praise for the work of productive Jews? Why should productive Muslims receive the same damnation as destructive Muslims?

    Nationalism is the irrational belief that your nation is better than others on the basis that you were born there.

    • Of course, I speak here in broad strokes that many will not find fair. That’s because it is’t fair; it just happens to be more accurate than not.

      I never wanted to talk about nationalism. Your definition does indeed describe something irrational and destructive. I want to bring this down to a more human level, in sympathy with the people of France who have seen their neighbourhoods radically changed for the worse, who cannot walk safely, especially if they are recognisably Jewish, through streets that might have been perfectly safe some years ago.

      What is disgraceful is all the public worry about this bringing about some kind of anti-Muslim backlash. This of course isn’t happening and never actually does after similar incidents. It has, in fact, motivated sympathisers with Merah to launch demonstrations in praise of him and vandalise Jewish graves. But its the Jewish victims that have been accused of dual loyalty in some quarters because they are being buried in Israel! What we are seeing today throughout Europe is something very unique: a native population that actually seek to become dhimmis, effectively, partly because of a fear that to be otherwise is bigoted.

      • Do you have stats to suggest that violence against Jewish people is higher than violence against Muslims? I’d find that very surprising.

        What exactly is the point of your blog?

        “Mass immigration from Third World, Islamic countries is going to have to be severely curtailed. This is how you drain the subversive Islamist swamp, not by blaming Israel or justified public skepticism of mass immigration.”

        You are expressing nationalism and bigotry. In fact you are encouraging violence against Muslims.

      • If you are talking about violence motivated by bigotry, then yes, the rate against Jews and other minorities is significantly higher compared with Muslims. The FBI periodically releases stats on hate crimes in America. Crimes against Jews are typically several times higher than crimes against Muslims: in 2006, it was 967 against Jews and 156 against Muslims, with no noticeable anti-Muslim backlash after events like Fort Hood (contrary to the claims of the Islamophobia industry). Same goes in 2010. The Met here in London has similar findings. In Sweden, the majority of the country’s hate crimes are directed against the very small Jewish community, many perpetrated by Muslims. Its bleeding the Jewish community there. Muslims in Europe are far more likely to commit a hate crime, particularly against Jews or homosexuals, than be a victim of one.

        I know people of a liberal disposition may instinctively feel for a minority like Muslims in Europe, and rightly so when they are victims of hate crimes and bad policy. But we should not be so foolish to believe that importing millions of people from illiberal cultures is a liberal policy. We should not be fooled into doing pro-Islamic advocacy, like so many are, perhaps reacting to the horrible misguided wars we have waged in Islamic countries.

        This blog has no single ‘point’. I just write what I feel like, or attack David Norris.

        I am unashamedly advocating the use of some type of coercion against Islamists entitled to the citizenship of another state, not productive and enlightened Muslims or those who have no connection to elsewhere. I think we should screen for political undesirables among immigrants, and ensure immigrants are compatible with the wider culture as much as possible. If Ireland in the last several years had imported hundreds of thousands of Sub-Saharan Muslims instead of white, Eastern European and predominantly Catholic Christians, Ireland’s experience with immigration would not have gone so smoothly. I’m not against immigration, even mass immigration per se, but recognize it carries some challenges.

      • Fair enough. I tend not to argue against stats, except your 2006 link doesnt reference its source. If you have European, french or Irish stats your point would have more valdiity and I would infact put anti-semitism higher on my watch list.

        You should be more careful on how you phrase things, if its Islamists you want to limit fine, but in your blog you mention reducing the Muslim population. Your comments seem very hateful.

  2. henrywood says:

    “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
    Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
    A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
    Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

    That was written in 1899 by Winston Churchill. Think of him whatever you will but not a single thing in his statement has changed. Indeed, the main change has been in the West where if any politician, even one of Churchill’s standing, dared to voice even half of that, he would make Enoch Powell look like a Lib-Dem wettest of the wets. No man shall speak of this threat to his own civilisation. I do not know why upright men are so afraid, do you? We have Mr. Livingstone (of London, not Africa) declaring if he is elected London will become an Islamic beacon to the world! Who, apart from serious and unforgiving adherents of Mohammed want such a thing to happen?

    The few improvements seen in the Arab world for womens’ rights, tolerance of gays etc., since the ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN YEARS when Churchill spoke those words, are now being set back in that same world because of the “Arab Spring”. Some Spring … if Spring comes can Winter be far behind? For all those who attack TheSystemWorks for telling it how it is, take off your rose coloured glasses and open your eyes.

    The retrograde force spoken about by Churchill is returning to very many parts of the Middle East. And it is *NOT* a seizure of power! The “Man in the Street” has cast his lot in with the return of Middle Age barbarism. You cannot blame them for this. They have never, ever known any other way of life than that preached to them every Friday and in which they truly believe. I am talking of the huge, overwhelming massive majority. Not the ladies in headscarves in an Egyptian square who have sampled Starbucks. (Now they have sampled other things on their home ground, things they never believed could have happened to them, but they only believed such things were impossible when the “tyrant” Mubarak was in power.

    Anyone who thinks there are green shoots of democracy in the Middle East does not know the Middle East. I lived and worked there for many, many years. It is no insult to the inhabitants of those countries to say they have a different mindset to the West. Churchill lived among them and realised this. Many expats today know this.

    Only the blind, those who absolutely will not see, refuse to even acknowledge the slightest possibility of truth in what I have written. None of them will discuss my words. They will come in with all barrels blazing to demonstrate how intolerant I am and following the usual diatribes they will depart with their egos newly polished having told that racist Henry bloke just where to go.

    Do they really and truly believe that feeding the likes of me and perhaps TheSystemWorks to the crocodiles they will be spared? I’ve got news for you… in the words of the Prophet, you are either a Muslim or you are an infidel and he plainly states the best way to deal with infidels. One of his followers coined the phrase: “First the Saturday people; then the Sunday people!” Which day of the week do *YOU* belong to?

  3. Paul says:

    With you 110% on this one John

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: