The SWP and the disturbing “Disputes Committee”.

So, it seems the Socialist Workers Party doesn’t believe in the bourgeois British justice system, and has decided to take matters into its own hands.

Just a few days ago, transcripts of an SWP conference were leaked on the internet.  They reveal that a certain leading member of the party, known as ‘Comrade Delta’, was accused of rape by a female colleague. Rather than call the police, the SWP referred the matter to a ‘dispute committee’, and freely admitted that several of Comrade Delta’s friends would be on the panel.

You may be surprised to hear that Comrade Delta was found innocent.

Now, this raises some interesting questions from the libertarian standpoint. I do believe there is room for competing systems of arbitration and justice, but I can’t help getting a feeling of revulsion in this case. Don’t think that’s just me out to get the socialists. The Conservative Party or some other group secretly handling criminal matters internally, for the good of the organisation or ideological movement, would be equally off-putting. It becomes truly disgusting when a movement sees it as alright for the accused to be judged by a group of his own friends.

Besides, how would they have punished Comrade Delta if he had been found guilty? Does anybody believe mere expulsion from his party amounts to justice?

The SWP should be subject to a police investigation, though I’m still inclined to believe that consenting adults are entitled to resolve their problems this way. What bothers me is the SWP’s secrecy. It all leaves too much room for abuse. Even in an institution composed of many good and decent people, there is a tendency to suppress potentially damning facts. I”ve written about this before.

I’d be genuinely be interested in the SWP’s ideological reasoning here.  Why keep such an important aspect of the SWP a secret? If the SWP were more transparent about this and stressed that everybody went through the system voluntarily, I might have some respect for their position. Why can’t they just say that this is what the SWP offers, and invite people to come on board if they wish? Maybe many more would be attracted to their unique courts system.

Now, there are ominous parallels with cults that have secret teachings, such as Scientology.

And any attacks the atheistic SWP have made against the Catholic Church’s internal investigations procedures when it comes to abuse look very, very hollow indeed.


About Cranky Notions
Reactionary. That fella from the Norris scandal.

3 Responses to The SWP and the disturbing “Disputes Committee”.

  1. Hey says:

    I am not defending the SWP, but it was the woman’s decision (the woman who made the complaint) not to go to the police, at least that is what I have read.

    • Yes, I believe it was all consensual. And yet, I am still disgusted by the whole thing. Its not that I believe these kind of arrangements should not exist. The secretive nature bothers me, as as do the completely awful procedures of the SWP’s little court. Give me bourgeois British justice over that any day.

      • Hey says:

        The SWP is spot on about their crits of the police and the court system, however, they ***cannot*** stand in place of the British Courts. They do not have expertise, they do not have access to forensic scientists, rape kits, on-call counselors, and they only thing that they can do to Smith is expel him (which they should do anyway and will need to do if they have even a shred of hope salvaging their organization).

        The courts, love’em, hate them, they are all that we have.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: